Skip to main content

Please, let them (us) talk!

I spent Friday at the local intermediate school district, meeting with other teacher-leaders trained in Reading Apprenticeship. I long for these days of quality professional development that isn't scripted, is flexible, and meets my needs. The highlight of the day: getting to talk to other teachers.

The power of talk isn't a revolutionary idea. Talk, just like writing, is used for a variety of purposes: to communicate, express, reflect, defend, think, etc. But more often than not, I feel as if academic and collegial conversations are looked down upon in the field. "Talk" and "conversation" have taken on negative connotations to others in a similar way that "test" and "assessment" have with teachers.

More often than not, I've found professional development to limit talking. As a result, I imagine that limits the speaking and listening that needs to take place in our classrooms. If we can't trust our teachers to have meaningful conversations, how will that translate into the trust necessary for student success? Sure, conversations go off on tangents, but so does our thinking! It's at that moment that we have to help each other bring the conversation back to the task at hand. I would also argue that this is a valuable skill to teach students. And if people talk about other things, they are probably things that matter to them. It's then that we have to learn how to connect the things that they see as important to what we see as it important. As a colleague once told me, we all have different questions that need answering. The difficult work is getting everyone to see how each other's answers are valuable--and they all are!

In the end, I left training with a list of new ideas--a list that wouldn't have come about if I hadn't had the opportunity to talk with so many colleagues. And this is what I was promised during my training in college: a chance to enter difficult, but necessary, conversations. When teachers have the opportunity to put their heads together, we all benefit from their collective knowledge--especially when teachers don't agree. There is something magical about cognitive dissonance! Teachers, like students, have knowledge that they can share, and varied experiences that enable them to contribute to a larger conversation that becomes enriched because of said experiences. All we need is the opportunity to talk about what is important to us.

This is also why I'm looking forward to the National Council of Teachers of English's annual convention. I know I'll have conversations with colleagues that will enrich, challenge, and extend my pedagogy.

As I try to make this a year of strategic talking in my classroom and with the group of Reading Apprenticeship teachers I am so excited to work with, I end with this thought: When we limit talk, we limit our growth as teachers. And when we limit our growth as teachers, we limit students' growth, too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding Words

I get to school early and my students know that. This morning, a student that I’m not even particularly close with arrived at 6:00 AM in tears. Ever since then, I’ve been trying to figure out what to say to students and colleagues about the presidential election.
This student and I talked about fear. We talked about her history. We talked about how she encouraged her mother to vote for the first time—ever. We talked about how she can’t understand why people would vote for a fear-mongering, hate-talking candidate like Donald Trump. We talked about her experience Monday seeing President Obama for the first time, an experience that she was so motivated to make happen. Toward the end of our conversation, she said that she finally finished Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. Not that I’m equating President-Elect Trump to the Dark Lord, but we talked about how even with Voldemort, people supported him. It may have been out of fear and group loyalty, but it was support nonetheless. And whil…

Letter to the Editor Regarding DeVos

***Update:  At the time this letter was read at Monday’s board meeting, the hearing regarding Betsy DeVos’ nomination as the secretary of education was still scheduled for Wednesday, January 11. Later that evening, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions postponed the hearing until January 17 at 5:00 PM.

This is a letter to the editor that I will submit for the January 12 edition of the Belleville-Area Independent. 
-----
To the Editor:
This week marks a defining moment for public education in the United States. On Wednesday, January 11, a hearing will have taken place regarding Betsy DeVos’ nomination as the secretary of education.
During the past few board meetings, I have expressed my concerns publicly about Mrs. DeVos’ appointment to the top education post, and I reiterate those same concerns here. I have contacted Senator Stabenow and Peter’s offices, and they both have now expressed their concerns regarding this appointment and have vowed to…

On Competition and Donald Trump, Jr.

Listening to Donald Trump, Jr.’s speech makes my blood boil.
There are a few points that need our attention.
1. Competition makes education better.
Browse Diane Ravitch’s blog post about the competition that has run rampant in Detroit Public Schools. She references Donald Cohen’s post, where he debunks the myth about competition increasing student achievement. Cohen concludes the following: “If charter schools were systematically outperforming DPS schools, these lessons would be easier to stomach in Detroit. But the city’s charter schools are rife with wasteful spending, double dipping, and insider dealing, and many have been allowed to operate for years despite terrible academic records.”
And let us not forget the Detroit Free Press’ exposé on charter schools. Many do not disclose how they spend public dollars, and the majority underperformed when compared to traditional public schools. Quoting the Free Press, public dollars were misused in ways such as: A Bedford Township charter sc…