Skip to main content

Playing Devil's Advocate

I can't count how many times I've reiterated one of the tenets of my teaching philosophy to students: "In here, talk drives learning." And in a world where I've noticed kids have much to say but sometimes struggle with recognizing that spoken words can become the written, I try to leverage their abilities to talk as much as possible before, during, and after writing.

I also believe that we learn the most when cognitive dissonance occurs. This is why my students participated in a round of devil's advocate on Friday, with several students sharing their claims and reasons, evidence, and examples in front of the entire class.

I have to say that the teaching and discussion were messy. Not only is it the first time students are really wrestling with writing about self-chosen topics and personally relevant subjects, but they are also having to defend those views publicly.

In order to provide students with some structure, we covered ground rules first. We agreed to not attack the person but, instead, challenge the examples, reasoning, and ideas. We're still working on establishing the difference, but they're getting there. I often have to remind myself that these are ninth graders; they aren't adults yet, so this is the perfect space to practice these potentially heated arguments with a mediator that my students trust (me).

We also talked about how we can leverage argumentative phrases that so many people use: "I believe that," "___________ should/n't," "One reason for," "You might consider," etc. There are so many, and we're adding to our lists every day.

The Common Core State Standards call for complexity. It's not just enough to take a stand for something, but you have to understand and consider the opposing side. These discussions added to the in-class generating we did earlier in the week, when I asked students to compose their own I Say/They Say charts about their topics (see below).


What I loved most about playing devil's advocate this past Friday is the energy from so many of the students. I was hoping to get through most students' claims and reasons, but we only managed to get through five or six each hour because of the time spent considering the newly raised counterclaims and examples. The discussion about racism was the most intense I saw all day. And this is understandable, considering what students are seeing unfold in the world around them. During that round, students were able to see how their claims should be refined based off the examples used to support, and how sometimes counterclaims can have a minutiae of truth. 

Here's a list of what some students are writing about:
  • Schools should not be allowed to search students for drugs. 
  • Racism is alive and well. 
  • Undocumented immigrants are more helpful than harmful. 
  • Transgender students should have equal rights in school.

With that said, I'm excited to see where students' drafts head next week. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Targets and Time

I just finished Cris Tovani and Elizabeth Birr Moje's No More Telling as Teaching: Less Lecture, More Engaged Learning from Heinemann's Not This But That series edited by Ellin Oliver Keene and Nell Duke.

Needless to say, I pick up anything that's by Tovani and Moje because of Tovani's belief in the workshop model and Moje's extensive work in both disciplinary and out of school literacies.

After finishing this quick read, I've been thinking a lot about two things.

First, how we spend our time matters. I get less than 60 minutes with students each hour. Time is a hot commodity! Because of that, I am constantly looking at ways to maximize instruction. If I pass papers back this way or if I move this to this point in time, I can gain another minute. And those minutes add up! Sometimes, however, it feels like there is just never enough time. All teachers know that. In fact, I've yet to meet a teacher admit that she or he has too much time with students, especia…

Letter to the Editor Regarding DeVos

***Update:  At the time this letter was read at Monday’s board meeting, the hearing regarding Betsy DeVos’ nomination as the secretary of education was still scheduled for Wednesday, January 11. Later that evening, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions postponed the hearing until January 17 at 5:00 PM.

This is a letter to the editor that I will submit for the January 12 edition of the Belleville-Area Independent
-----
To the Editor:
This week marks a defining moment for public education in the United States. On Wednesday, January 11, a hearing will have taken place regarding Betsy DeVos’ nomination as the secretary of education.
During the past few board meetings, I have expressed my concerns publicly about Mrs. DeVos’ appointment to the top education post, and I reiterate those same concerns here. I have contacted Senator Stabenow and Peter’s offices, and they both have now expressed their concerns regarding this appointment and have vowed to…

Stop Ignoring Research

I just finished Kylene Beers and Robert Probst's Disrupting Thinking. I keep thinking about page 103 in the text, where they discuss the idea of "research-based practices" and how many of us "are willing to ignore what we know from research." They mention teaching grammar in isolation, spelling lists, lack of conferring in writing classrooms, monologic talk, prescribing novels without choice--the list goes on and on. I get frustrated because I hear from other teachers often excuses for why they do these things. And even I have felt forced to resort to some of these practices at times because it's what kids have been conditioned to expect at school. It is amazing how quiet a classroom can be when you give every student a worksheet. And if compliance is our end goal, then a worksheet works. But if we want students to undertake meaningful work that's often the work supported by best practices, we're going to have to be willing to get a whole lot more u…