Skip to main content

Reading Glasses

"Let me guess... You teach English?" I've been asked the same question by nearly everyone when I reveal that I'm a teacher. I can thank my distant relatives for the name change to "English" from a Polish surname that we can only remember how to pronounce and never to spell.

I've noticed that revealing you're an English teacher elicits one of two reactions: 1) People either stop talking and are afraid that you will correct, critique, nitpick (<insert the pedantic verb of your choice>); or 2) People feel as if you are on their side and agree that something is taking place to the detriment of the wonderful, precious English language. And it was during my routine eye exam that my optometrist goaded me into the second camp.

He expected sympathy when he said, "I once had a secretary who would use 'seen' without the helping verb." And I responded with a quick, "Oh?', hoping to move the conversation away from the stereotypical view of English teachers in which I knew this was heading and, instead, to the condition of my eyes. But he continued. He lambasted his former employer for her "misuse" (I would argue that it was colloquial) of "seen," and then he continued to rant about the age-old debate of "me" and "I." And I bit my tongue.

I know people feel strongly about this. Rules are nice. They create boundaries. They tell you what to do and what not to do. They make us feel secure, and then they help create these ivory towers of power. And as much as I want my students to use the rules, I can't--and will never--reduce my job to the study of a few rules (many of which were created based on personal preferences). English language arts is so much more than that.

I ultimately received news that my vision hasn't changed. My right eye is slightly worse than my left eye, and I have a mild astigmatism. He kindly informed me that they don't make contacts for such mild astigmatisms, so I would be saving money. But as I left, he also reminded me that it was my responsibility to save American teenagers from "improper" grammar.

I nodded in the affirmative, but I regret that I didn't provide a larger picture for the work that I, and so many other English teachers, do every day. And this is what I should've told him:

I work tirelessly every day to match kids with books they want to read. And when they finally finish a book--and many admit to having read a book for the first time in years--I try to help them find another. Our reading lives are never done.

Then they talk about books. They share what they are reading. They swap titles, authors, and genres. They conduct book talks. They interview each other about what they've read. I encourage them to tweet about their books, like we did at the end of the school year. And when we are all reading the same book, students question their peers. They work through difficult texts--many of which were never written for or intended to be used in a high school classroom. Have you ever tried to prompt a student to speak in front of his or her peers? That alone is extremely difficult for young people. Their peers can be so cruel and judgmental.

And when students aren't reading or talking about their reading, they are writing. But I've found that writing is even trickier than silently reading a book or talking. Writing is visible proof that you might struggle with something. Do you know how difficult that is for a student that has been told time and time again that he or she can't do something or isn't good at it?

And grammar is the worst.

This notion of "bad grammar" infuriates me. There is no such thing. Everyone has a grammar. We acquire it at home by hearing others speak. Sometimes, however, we don't acquire an academic grammar, school English, or any other variant of "proper English." But the connotation of the word "proper" can send a permanently debilitating message to students that they are then "improper." With all dichotomies, you must be one or the other. And if you are improper, then school is not the place for you.

I don't want my students to EVER feel like that.

And then when I finally get a student to write, I want them to think about higher order concerns first. Are your ideas conveyed clearly? How's your voice? Does this sound like you, or did you lose your voice when trying to appease me, the keeper of the rules? Is this the appropriate genre for your writing? Have you conducted enough research, or are there questions you still need to ask?

See, at the end of the day, English is much more than grammar rules. I want my students to recognize that language, whether it is written or spoken, has power. They know that people might judge them by the language they use, but I also want them equipped to talk back to the pedants. I want them to recognize school English and have it in their repertoire to use it. But I don't want them to feel ashamed. I want them to have a lifelong passion for reading and writing.

Comments

  1. I love this post! I wish more English teachers thought like you. Our biggest debate is knowing or identifying the parts of speech. I taught 4th grade and many upper level teachers would be upset because students could not correctly identify parts of speech. I lean towards the just get them to write side of this debate. In today's world how important is it that they know what a noun or verb is? I was just wondering about your thoughts on this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I go back and forth on this one, Leigh. I think there's something to be said about knowing how words function and recognizing the patterns, like adverbs ending in -ly. I do, however, think that there are some elements of grammar that it really doesn't matter if students can identify them, e.g., participles and gerunds. As long as they recognize how a word is functioning, that's more important, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been teaching English for seven years and I couldn't tell you what a gerund is. (But I could Google it) #justsayin

      Delete
    2. Yes, if you want to see 8th graders cry, introduce gerunds, participles, etc. at the end of the year.

      Delete
  3. I think knowing the basic parts of speech is very important when learning to be a writer and a reader - understanding the basic function of a sentence. Kevin, your post is wonderful.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting thought: no bad grammar, just different and maybe improper. I know grammar instruction hasn't been shown to improve students' writing, but I think the reality is more nuanced than that. Whatever the truth, as you say, "English is much more than grammar rules."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, I have definitely been in the Grammar Police camp, having been a professional editor for a decade. But I also never forgot the lessons of a several-day Writing Process workshop at RESA many years ago. One was that, despite my familiarity with the "rules" (including those few seem to follow anymore, such as when to use the subjunctive mood and to never allow dangling participles -- even if folks know perfectly well what you mean), most of my writing skill came from two OTHER things: voracious reading and lots of practice. Reading enabled me to be a fluent writer; practice helped perfect my skills. The "rules" could not possibly encompass all the unwritten, complex structure of real grammar. That is why, to this day, I will override the rules when something looks or sounds wrong to me. (Or, sometimes, I will just avoid the usage when the "correct" version sounds wrong. I cannot say the word "forte," for example, because nearly everyone thinks it has an accent on that silent "E." Better to substitute "strength" or, informally, "super-power"!)

    A second lesson, truly learned when I helped pilot a writing workshop with 8-year-olds in my basement that summer, was that it is good to distinguish between "published" work (in which you strive for adherence to the rules, as well as to eloquent expression of ideas) and "draft" work (in which fluency and expression rule). Insisting on a standard of perfection for all writing terribly inhibits expression of ideas -- which is, after all, what writing instruction should be about. [And ending that sentence with a preposition is a great example of warranted disregard of rules!]

    Long-windedly, I'm saying you have a good point -- even though my editor's left brain will always inwardly rail at grammatical errors. You have no idea how often I stifle THAT expression! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. When english became the world's lingua franca and teaching it a highly profitable enterprise, it lost its self respect. It can be a language that resonates such beauty, mystery and diversity but it has been reduced to mere parody of itself by the EFL industry. Because more people now speak english as a foreign languange than as their mother tongue, it has been "dumbed down" for the sake of efficiency . We are heading towards Orwell's doublespeak. Obscure languages disappear because they are spoken by too few. English is disappearing because it is spoken by too many. No other linguistic group has to listen to their language being so badly spoken by so many people. I find it irritating that most EFL teachers have no love for the language they teach. Methodology should not preclude passion. So, say only "strength" if you must, but I intend to say "forte" too, and to say it loud.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Finding Words

I get to school early and my students know that. This morning, a student that I’m not even particularly close with arrived at 6:00 AM in tears. Ever since then, I’ve been trying to figure out what to say to students and colleagues about the presidential election.
This student and I talked about fear. We talked about her history. We talked about how she encouraged her mother to vote for the first time—ever. We talked about how she can’t understand why people would vote for a fear-mongering, hate-talking candidate like Donald Trump. We talked about her experience Monday seeing President Obama for the first time, an experience that she was so motivated to make happen. Toward the end of our conversation, she said that she finally finished Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. Not that I’m equating President-Elect Trump to the Dark Lord, but we talked about how even with Voldemort, people supported him. It may have been out of fear and group loyalty, but it was support nonetheless. And whil…

Letter to the Editor Regarding DeVos

***Update:  At the time this letter was read at Monday’s board meeting, the hearing regarding Betsy DeVos’ nomination as the secretary of education was still scheduled for Wednesday, January 11. Later that evening, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions postponed the hearing until January 17 at 5:00 PM.

This is a letter to the editor that I will submit for the January 12 edition of the Belleville-Area Independent
-----
To the Editor:
This week marks a defining moment for public education in the United States. On Wednesday, January 11, a hearing will have taken place regarding Betsy DeVos’ nomination as the secretary of education.
During the past few board meetings, I have expressed my concerns publicly about Mrs. DeVos’ appointment to the top education post, and I reiterate those same concerns here. I have contacted Senator Stabenow and Peter’s offices, and they both have now expressed their concerns regarding this appointment and have vowed to…

On Competition and Donald Trump, Jr.

Listening to Donald Trump, Jr.’s speech makes my blood boil.
There are a few points that need our attention.
1. Competition makes education better.
Browse Diane Ravitch’s blog post about the competition that has run rampant in Detroit Public Schools. She references Donald Cohen’s post, where he debunks the myth about competition increasing student achievement. Cohen concludes the following: “If charter schools were systematically outperforming DPS schools, these lessons would be easier to stomach in Detroit. But the city’s charter schools are rife with wasteful spending, double dipping, and insider dealing, and many have been allowed to operate for years despite terrible academic records.”
And let us not forget the Detroit Free Pressexposé on charter schools. Many do not disclose how they spend public dollars, and the majority underperformed when compared to traditional public schools. Quoting the Free Press, public dollars were misused in ways such as: A Bedford Township charter sc…